Discover
Map the exposure
Identify vulnerable systems, services, applications, configurations, and access paths.
01
Assessment model
Automation breadth. Human depth.
Automated tools provide broad and repeatable coverage. Human testers provide creativity, context, and the ability to determine what a real attacker could actually achieve.
Validate
Confirm real exploitability
Separate meaningful weaknesses from false positives and low-value scanner noise.
Prioritize
Connect findings to impact
Evaluate technical severity alongside business, operational, and compliance exposure.
Remediate
Define the next actions
Translate evidence into sequenced recommendations, ownership, and practical remediation work.
Assessment deliverables
Evidence-backed findings tied to credible attack paths.
Risk prioritization aligned with operational and compliance impact.
Roadmap-ready guidance for remediation and security investment.
02
Core service 1
Network scanning from four critical perspectives
Each scan type reveals a different view of the environment. Together, they show what unauthenticated outsiders, authenticated users, internal actors, and internet-based attackers may be able to access.
Internet-facing exposure
External scans
Identify vulnerabilities, exposed services, weak configurations, and reachable systems visible from outside the organization.
Outside-in view
Internal environment
Internal scans
Assess vulnerabilities and trust relationships that become relevant after an attacker or unauthorized user gains internal access.
Inside-the-network view
No credentials
Unauthenticated scans
Simulate what an attacker can discover without valid credentials, revealing perimeter weaknesses, exposed interfaces, and misconfiguration.
Unknown-user perspective
Valid credentials
Authenticated scans
Examine systems using approved credentials to uncover missing patches, privilege issues, weak controls, and deeper configuration problems.
Authorized-user perspective
Additional capabilities
Standards-aligned discovery
Risk trend analysis
Device and network assessment
Findings can be compared over time to show whether exposure, control maturity, and remediation performance are improving.
03
Core service 2
Penetration and wireless testing
Penetration testing goes beyond vulnerability identification. US ProTech specialists actively test discovered weaknesses to establish what a determined attacker could access, change, or disrupt.
Exploit validation
Confirm whether identified weaknesses can be used under realistic conditions.
Custom attack simulation
Model attacks around the organization’s environment, architecture, assets, and likely threat scenarios.
Wireless security analysis
Evaluate access points, encryption, segmentation, rogue devices, and insecure configurations.
Post-exploitation testing
Assess lateral movement, data access, privilege escalation, detection capability, and response readiness.
04
Core service 3
Web application assessments
Browser-based systems such as customer portals, financial applications, CRMs, and SaaS platforms are tested for exploitable weaknesses aligned with common OWASP risk categories.
Injection attacks
SQL injection and related techniques targeting databases, APIs, and back-end services.
Browser manipulation
Cross-site scripting, CSRF, and client-side attacks that exploit user trust or application behavior.
Authentication weaknesses
Session, credential, authorization, and account-recovery flaws that may enable unauthorized access.
Sensitive data exposure
Weak storage, transmission, logging, or access controls that place protected information at risk.
05
Core service 4
Validation and public security assurance
After scanning, testing, and remediation, qualifying organizations may receive a US ProSecure Validation Mark reflecting their assessment cadence and alignment with defined security controls.
Continuous assurance
Represents the strongest validation cadence and sustained adherence to the applicable assessment criteria.
Regular validation
Demonstrates recurring security assessment with meaningful controls and targeted improvements underway.
Baseline commitment
Indicates adoption of structured scanning, remediation, and foundational security-validation practices.
Verifiable security posture
Validation can provide customers, partners, and stakeholders with visible evidence that the organization actively assesses and improves its security posture.
Assessment → Remediation → Validation
Assessment outcome
Know what is exposed, what is exploitable, and what to fix first.
US ProTech combines automated precision, human intelligence, real-world attack simulation, and structured validation into one multi-layered assessment model.
Clearer exposure
See weaknesses across networks, credentials,
wireless systems, and applications.
Credible findings
Validate exploitability and reduce false positives
before decisions are made.
Actionable remediation
Prioritize work using evidence,
business impact, and compliance context.